Executive finding
The public record proves a records-access dispute. It does not prove adjudicated obstruction.
New Mexico DOJ's acquired June 30 letter documents a sequence of requests for unredacted Epstein/Zorro Ranch records, including a May 3 Touhy request and a July 31 requested access date. The official DOJ-side public record acquired for this run is not a written NM-specific response; it is Jay Clayton's July 15 Senate exchange saying the documents are subject to protections including court protective orders and that DOJ personnel were seeking an accommodation. NMDOJ letter Clayton exchange
The strict classification is unresolved. July 31 is a New Mexico demand and denial-trigger date in the acquired letter, and separately an interim-report date for the New Mexico House Special Investigatory Committee under HR 1; no acquired source makes July 31 a federal court production deadline. NMDOJ letter HR 1
Editorial boundary: This page does not infer wrongdoing from archive presence, property references, travel references, committee questions, or redactions. It does not republish redacted identities, reconstruct victim names, or treat a party phrase such as "hindering" or "obstruction" as a court finding.
What the acquired record establishes
| Gate | Current Finding |
|---|---|
| Status as of acquisition | Pending / source-gated. No DOJ written NM-specific response was acquired. |
| Official request acquired | Yes: NMDOJ June 30, 2026 letter. |
| DOJ response acquired | No written NM-specific response; official July 15 Clayton public statement acquired. |
| July 31 classification | NMDOJ party demand/denial trigger, plus separate HR 1 interim-report deadline. Not a federal court production deadline in acquired sources. |
| Ad policy | AD-EXCLUDE by route policy. |
| Evidence data | Public JSON/TSV source layer; noindex by worker policy. |
Established record
The June 30 NMDOJ letter exists, was released by NMDOJ, and asks DOJ for access or production by July 31, 2026. source
DOJ position
Clayton's public Senate exchange says protective orders and other protections affect unredacted records, with dialogue toward accommodation. source
Unresolved
The acquired public file does not show a written DOJ Touhy decision, production ledger, or NM-specific court modification request. missing records
What is disputed or not public
NMDOJ's position is that unredacted access has not been granted and that the delay is unreasonable. DOJ's public position located here is that protections, including court protective orders, constrain access and that an accommodation was being explored. Those statements are not automatically contradictory because a protective-order negotiation can coexist with a pending or incomplete production record. NMDOJ release Clayton exchange
What is not public in the acquired set: the February 13 request, the March 13 request, the May 3 Touhy letter, any DOJ written response, any record-by-record production inventory, any NM-specific Rule 6(e) petition, any protective-order modification motion for NMDOJ access, and the actual legislative subpoena PDFs. gap ledger
What New Mexico says it is investigating
NMDOJ announced on February 19 that it reopened a criminal investigation into alleged illegal activity at Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch after reviewing recently released DOJ information, and it announced on March 9 that it searched the former property as part of that investigation. Those state statements establish NMDOJ's announced investigative posture, not the truth of every underlying allegation. February 19 statement March 9 statement
Request and response chronology
| Date | Event | NMDOJ Position | DOJ Position | Source | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | New Mexico prior investigation closed at request of SDNY according to NMDOJ | NMDOJ says the earlier state investigation was closed in 2019 at the request of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. | No public DOJ record confirming or disputing that 2019 request was acquired. | nmd-2026-02-19-zorro-reopen | State position documented; underlying 2019 federal request not acquired. |
| 2026-02-13 | NMDOJ says it sent its initial written request to then-Deputy Attorney General Blanche. | Requested a specific EFTA document and all related investigative materials connected to Zorro Ranch. | No public DOJ response to the February 13 request was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | The February 13 request letter itself was not acquired. |
| 2026-02-19 | NMDOJ announced the Zorro Ranch investigation was reopened. | Special agents and prosecutors would seek immediate access to the complete, unredacted federal case file. | No public DOJ response to the February 19 statement was acquired. | nmd-2026-02-19-zorro-reopen | Press release only. |
| 2026-03-09 | NMDOJ announced a search of the former Zorro Ranch property. | The search was part of the reopened criminal investigation and current property owners cooperated. | No public DOJ response to the search statement was acquired. | nmd-2026-03-09-zorro-search | Search warrant, inventory, and return were not acquired. |
| 2026-03-13 | NMDOJ says it sent a formal letter to Attorney General Bondi. | Identified five illustrative redacted EFTA documents and requested complete, unredacted versions of all pertinent records. | No public DOJ response to the March 13 letter was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | The March 13 letter and five EFTA IDs were not acquired. |
| 2026-04-01 | NMDOJ says DOJ directed it to submit a formal Touhy letter. | NMDOJ describes a telephone conference with Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana in which DOJ affirmed cooperation and directed a Touhy letter. | No public DOJ call memorandum or written direction was acquired. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Underlying call record not acquired. |
| 2026-05-03 | NMDOJ says it submitted a comprehensive Touhy request. | Sent to First Assistant U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison and FBI Albuquerque SAC Justin Garris, requesting a response by May 11. | No public DOJ Touhy decision was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Touhy request PDF/letter itself not acquired. |
| 2026-05-11 | NMDOJ-requested Touhy response date. | NMDOJ says no substantive response followed. | No public DOJ response by that date was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Party-requested date, not a court deadline in acquired records. |
| 2026-05-29 | NMDOJ says it sent written follow-up to Blanche and Pestana. | Follow-up correspondence was sent after no substantive response. | No public DOJ answer to the follow-up was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | The May 29 follow-up itself was not acquired. |
| 2026-06-04/2026-06-05 | NMDOJ says it requested meetings with Blanche's office. | NMDOJ says those meeting requests received no response. | No public DOJ scheduling response was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Meeting-request messages not acquired. |
| 2026-06-09 | NMDOJ public statement at World Without Exploitation conference. | Called on DOJ to release records in full, unredacted form to law enforcement. | No public DOJ response to that release was acquired. | nmd-2026-06-09-world-without-exploitation | Advocacy statement; not a production log. |
| 2026-06-30 | NMDOJ sent new letter to Blanche and Pestana. | Demanded immediate access to unredacted records and requested production/database access by July 31, 2026. | No public DOJ written response to this letter was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | One-sided letter; does not establish DOJ's non-public rationale. |
| 2026-07-09 | NMDOJ published press release and June 30 letter. | NMDOJ described more than 130 days since its initial request and said unredacted access had not been granted. | No contemporaneous official DOJ release was located. | nmd-2026-07-09-press-release | State characterization of DOJ response status. |
| 2026-07-15 | Senator Heinrich questioned Jay Clayton about the New Mexico request. | Question framed the issue as DOJ blocking or failing to give New Mexico documents it needs. | Clayton said the request was for unredacted documents, documents were subject to protections including court protective orders, and DOJ personnel were seeking dialogue with NMDOJ to reach an accommodation consistent with those orders. | sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | Public hearing exchange, not the full written DOJ response. |
| 2026-07-15 | Senator Hirono press release summarized Todd Blanche's commitment to cooperate with New Mexico. | Not a NMDOJ filing. | The Senate release says Blanche committed on record to cooperating with New Mexico's investigation. | sen-hirono-2026-07-15-blanche | Summary page; underlying full hearing transcript/video not archived in this run. |
| 2026-07-15 | NMDOJ announced support for EFTA II draft legislation. | EFTA II would create new enforcement and access pathways if enacted. | No official DOJ position on the draft was acquired. | nmd-2026-07-15-efta-ii-release | Proposed law only. |
| 2026-07-31 | NMDOJ requested production/access date and House committee interim-report date. | NMDOJ told DOJ that if access was not received by July 31, NMDOJ would treat the request as denied and pursue all available remedies; HR 1 separately requires an interim committee report by July 31. | No public DOJ written response agreeing to or rejecting the July 31 demand date was located. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | July 31 is a party/request deadline in the NMDOJ letter and an interim legislative reporting deadline in HR 1; no acquired source makes it a federal court production deadline. |
Legal mechanism tracker
The important distinction is public release versus controlled law-enforcement access. EFTA, DOJ's public release protocol, Rule 6(e), protective orders, the CVRA, Privacy Act concerns, and child-victim protections may all matter, but each has a different scope and a different path for authorization, modification, or controlled handling. EFTA Touhy regulations
| Mechanism | Authority | Barrier Class | Path | Public Action Located | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMDOJ_TOUHY_REQUEST_PROCESS DOJ Touhy approval process for requests or demands for agency records or employee testimony in proceedings where the United States is not a party. | ecfr-touhy-subpart-b | CONDITIONAL | DOJ component authorization, narrowing, confidentiality terms, or judicial process if required. | No NM-specific DOJ written Touhy decision located. | UNRESOLVED |
| GRAND_JURY_RULE_6E Grand jury secrecy for matters occurring before a grand jury. | uscode-rule-6 | CONDITIONAL | Identify covered material and seek court authorization or other applicable Rule 6(e) route where necessary. | No NM-specific Rule 6(e) petition or order located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| MAXWELL_PROTECTIVE_ORDER_DKT36 Protective order governing confidential discovery in United States v. Maxwell. | doj-efta00009664-maxwell-protective-order | CONFIRMED_FOR_CASE_RECORDS | Court modification, accommodation under the order, or controlled production consistent with the order. | Maxwell protective order acquired; no NM-specific modification motion located. | CONDITIONAL_BARRIER |
| MAXWELL_RULE17_EVCF_ORDER Confidentiality order for Rule 17 materials and the EVCP in United States v. Maxwell. | doj-efta00009654-rule17-confidentiality-order | CONFIRMED_FOR_CASE_RECORDS | Court authorization, modification, or controlled access path. | Order acquired; no NM-specific motion located. | CONDITIONAL_BARRIER |
| EFTA_PUBLIC_RELEASE_REDACTION_CATEGORIES EFTA public-release redaction and withholding categories. | govinfo-plaw-119-38-efta | CONFIRMED_FOR_PUBLIC_RELEASE | Written justification for public withholdings; controlled law-enforcement sharing must still satisfy applicable privacy, protective-order, and case-specific limits. | DOJ EFTA review protocol and public disclosures acquired. | CONFIRMED_PUBLIC_REDACTION_AUTHORITY |
| CVRA_PRIVACY_DIGNITY Crime Victims' Rights Act dignity and privacy protections. | uscode-cvra-3771 | CONDITIONAL | Victim-sensitive review, protective terms, or court-supervised process. | No NM-specific victim-notification or CVRA accommodation record located. | UNRESOLVED |
| PRIVACY_ACT_552A Privacy Act restrictions and exceptions for federal records maintained on individuals. | uscode-privacy-act-552a | CONDITIONAL | Identify system of records, routine use, law-enforcement request fit, or court-order route. | No NM-specific Privacy Act analysis located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| CHILD_VICTIM_WITNESS_AND_CSAM_CONTROLS Child-victim privacy and child sexual-abuse-material custody controls. | uscode-child-victim-3509 | CONFIRMED_FOR_PROTECTED_CONTENT | Secure law-enforcement handling, court authorization if needed, and no public release. | No NM-specific CSAM handling protocol located. | CONFIRMED_BARRIER_WITH_CONTROLLED_ACCESS_QUESTION |
| FOIA_PUBLIC_RELEASE_DISTINCTION FOIA and EFTA public-release frameworks do not automatically answer confidential state law-enforcement access. | uscode-foia-552 | NOT_A_CATEGORICAL_BARRIER | Record-classification review and disclosure agreement/order tailored to law-enforcement use. | No public DOJ record resolving this distinction for NM located. | UNRESOLVED |
| NM_HR1_LEGISLATIVE_SUBPOENA_POWER New Mexico House Special Investigatory Committee subpoena and hearing authority. | nmlegis-hr1-final | STATE_INVESTIGATORY_TOOL | Service proof, return, compliance response, enforcement, or litigation record. | Committee agenda, handout, public folder, and 20 subpoena PDFs acquired; service/response/compliance records not located. | SUBPOENAS_ACQUIRED_COMPLIANCE_PENDING |
| PROPOSED_EFTA_II Proposed legislation to add state/survivor enforcement and access routes. | nmd-efta-ii-draft | NOT_CURRENT_LAW | Congressional enactment before it can create enforceable rights. | Draft and press release acquired. | PROPOSED_ONLY |
Records production ledger
No public production ledger for records transmitted from DOJ to NMDOJ was acquired. The rows below therefore separate public EFTA release activity from the unresolved New Mexico access request. DOJ public disclosures NMDOJ request
| Row | Record Category | Request Date | DOJ Response | Production Status | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROD-001 | Specific EFTA document named in NMDOJ's February 13 request | 2026-02-13 | No public written response located | NOT_PUBLICLY_VERIFIED | Not public; July 31 later requested in June 30 letter | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-002 | All Zorro Ranch investigative materials related to the specific EFTA document | 2026-02-13 | No public written response located | NOT_PUBLICLY_VERIFIED | Not public; July 31 later requested in June 30 letter | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-003 | Five illustrative redacted EFTA records identified in NMDOJ's March 13 letter | 2026-03-13 | No public written response located | NOT_PUBLICLY_VERIFIED | None acquired | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-004 | Comprehensive Touhy request to USAO-DNM and FBI Albuquerque | 2026-05-03 | No public Touhy decision located | NOT_PUBLICLY_VERIFIED | 2026-05-11 requested response date | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-005 | Unredacted names of survivors, witnesses, co-conspirators, and other individuals under public redactions | 2026-06-30 | Clayton public testimony cited protective orders and accommodation efforts; written NM-specific DOJ response not located. | NOT_PUBLICLY_VERIFIED | 2026-07-31 party-requested date | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-006 | Secure database or bulk access path for NMDOJ | 2026-06-30 | No public DOJ acceptance or denial located | PENDING_OR_UNKNOWN | 2026-07-31 party-requested date | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-007 | Protective agreement, confidentiality agreement, or state-court subpoena accommodation | 2026-06-30 | No public DOJ acceptance or denial located | NOT_PUBLICLY_LOCATED | 2026-07-31 party-requested date | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| PROD-008 | Public EFTA disclosure datasets | 2025-2026 | DOJ published public datasets with redactions and identified withholding categories. | PUBLIC_RELEASE_EXISTS | EFTA public-release deadlines, not NMDOJ July 31 demand | doj-epstein-disclosures |
Court order inventory
The acquired record includes actual Maxwell-case protective/confidentiality orders and DOJ letters referencing EFTA public-production court orders. It does not include a court order specifically deciding New Mexico's access request. Maxwell protective order Rule 17 order
| Order | Court/Docket | Date | Relevance | NM-Specific Modification | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORDER-001 United States v. Maxwell protective order, Dkt. 36 / EFTA00009664 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York 1:20-cr-00330 | 2020-07-30 | Concrete protective order in the Maxwell criminal case; may govern covered discovery, but the acquired record does not prove every NM-requested record is covered. | Not located | doj-efta00009664-maxwell-protective-order |
| ORDER-002 United States v. Maxwell Rule 17/EVCP confidentiality order / EFTA00009654 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York 1:20-cr-00330 | 2020 | Concrete confidentiality order for covered Maxwell materials; record-specific application to NM requests unresolved. | Not located | doj-efta00009654-rule17-confidentiality-order |
| ORDER-003 SDNY EFTA public-production court orders referenced by DOJ | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York 1:20-cr-00330 | 2025-2026 | DOJ's February 14 letter identifies docket numbers for EFTA-related unsealing/public-production orders. They are public-production context, not a located NM-specific access order. | Not located | doj-2026-02-14-congress-letter |
| ORDER-004 Unspecified protective order referenced by Jay Clayton in July 15 hearing exchange | Unspecified in acquired hearing excerpt Unspecified | Unspecified | Official public DOJ-side statement that requested documents are subject to court protective orders; not enough to name a particular order for every record requested by NMDOJ. | Not located | sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton |
Action taken matrix
| Action | Actor | Date | Public Record | Result | Limitation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACT-001 | NMDOJ | 2026-02-19 | Located | Investigation publicly announced. | Public statement only. | nmd-2026-02-19-zorro-reopen |
| ACT-002 | NMDOJ | 2026-03-09 | Located | Search publicly announced. | Search warrant, affidavit, inventory, and return not acquired. | nmd-2026-03-09-zorro-search |
| ACT-003 | NMDOJ | 2026-02-13 to 2026-06-05 | Partial | Chronology documented by NMDOJ; underlying letters not acquired except June 30. | One-sided chronology until underlying correspondence or DOJ response is public. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| ACT-004 | USDOJ | 2025-2026 | Located | Public release record exists; confidential NM access unresolved. | Public release is not the same event as NMDOJ production. | doj-epstein-disclosures |
| ACT-005 | USDOJ / Jay Clayton | 2026-07-15 | Located | Official public position located. | No written NM-specific response or accommodation terms acquired. | sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton |
| ACT-006 | USDOJ / Todd Blanche | 2026-07-15 | Located | Official Senate summary located. | Underlying full transcript/video not archived in this run. | sen-hirono-2026-07-15-blanche |
| ACT-007 | New Mexico House Special Investigatory Committee | 2026 | Located | Legal authority and 20 public June 2026 HR 1 subpoena PDFs located; service/response/compliance records not located. | Public subpoena PDFs do not substitute for service proof, returns, responses, or compliance records. | nmlegis-hr1-final |
| ACT-008 | NMDOJ / congressional sponsors | 2026-07-15 | Located | Proposed legislation located. | Not current law. | nmd-efta-ii-draft |
Deadline audit
| Date | Classification | Legally Binding | Court Ordered | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | NMDOJ-requested Touhy response date | false | false | Passed; NMDOJ says no substantive response by June 30. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| 2026-07-31 | NMDOJ party demand/denial trigger | false | false | Future/pending as of July 19, 2026. | nmd-2026-06-30-letter |
| 2026-07-31 | New Mexico House Special Investigatory Committee interim report deadline | true | false | Future/pending as of July 19, 2026. | nmlegis-hr1-final |
| 2026-12-31 | New Mexico House Special Investigatory Committee final report deadline | true | false | Future/pending as of July 19, 2026. | nmlegis-hr1-final |
Claim-source matrix
Every claim row is tied to an acquired source. Testimony, party press releases, committee materials, and DOJ public pages are labels, not shortcuts to truth.
| Claim | Summary | Type | Source | Limitation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-001 | NMDOJ published a June 30, 2026 letter to Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche and Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana about access to unredacted Epstein/Zorro Ranch records. | DOCUMENTARY_FACT | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Document existence and text only. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-002 | NMDOJ says its initial written request was sent on February 13, 2026. | PARTY_POSITION | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Underlying February 13 letter not acquired. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-003 | NMDOJ says it sent a March 13, 2026 formal letter identifying five illustrative redacted EFTA documents. | PARTY_POSITION | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | The March 13 letter and five EFTA IDs were not acquired. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-004 | NMDOJ says DOJ directed it during an April 1, 2026 telephone conference to submit a Touhy letter. | PARTY_POSITION | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Underlying call record not acquired. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-005 | NMDOJ says it sent a comprehensive Touhy request on May 3, 2026 and requested a response by May 11, 2026. | PARTY_POSITION | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Touhy letter not acquired. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-006 | NMDOJ says it sent a May 29 follow-up and June 4-5 meeting requests, and that it had received no substantive response by June 30. | PARTY_POSITION | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Follow-up letters and meeting requests not acquired; no DOJ written response located. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-007 | NMDOJ requested access or production by July 31, 2026 and said it would treat non-receipt by then as a denial. | DOCUMENTARY_FACT | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Party demand date; not a federal court production deadline in acquired sources. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-008 | The July 31, 2026 date is not classified as a court deadline in the acquired records. | LEGAL_CLASSIFICATION | nmd-2026-06-30-letter nmlegis-hr1-final | Based on acquired record set; a non-public court order could change this classification. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-009 | NMDOJ offered to abide by security, confidentiality, protective agreements, and to secure a state-court subpoena if DOJ wanted that process. | DOCUMENTARY_FACT | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Offer documented; DOJ acceptance not located. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-010 | NMDOJ says the earlier state investigation closed in 2019 at SDNY's request. | PARTY_POSITION | nmd-2026-02-19-zorro-reopen nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Underlying 2019 SDNY request not acquired. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-011 | NMDOJ announced a March 9, 2026 search of the former Zorro Ranch property as part of the reopened criminal investigation. | DOCUMENTARY_FACT | nmd-2026-03-09-zorro-search | Search warrant and return not acquired. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-012 | New Mexico HR 1 created or empowered the House Special Investigatory Committee with subpoena and hearing authority. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | nmlegis-hr1-final | Authority only; does not prove any particular subpoena was served. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-013 | HR 1 set an interim-report deadline of July 31, 2026 and a final-report deadline of December 31, 2026 for the committee. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | nmlegis-hr1-final | Legislative reporting deadline, separate from NMDOJ's DOJ-records demand date. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-014 | The June 18 committee agenda included updates on subpoenas, correspondence, and survivor testimony. | DOCUMENTARY_FACT | nmlegis-hisc-jun18-agenda | Agenda item only; does not include underlying subpoena PDFs. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-015 | The June 1 committee handout lists DOJ, FBI, USAO-DNM, USAO-SDNY, the FAA, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan, and state agencies as subpoena targets, and the public Truth Commission folder contains 20 June 2026 HR 1 subpoena PDFs. | COMMITTEE_POSITION | nmlegis-hisc-jun01-handout truth-subpoena-usao-sdny | Public subpoena PDFs are acquired; acquisition does not prove service, return, response, enforcement, or compliance. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-016 | DOJ maintains a public EFTA library and public disclosure pages with privacy notices and redacted releases. | DOCUMENTARY_FACT | doj-epstein-library doj-epstein-disclosures | Public-release record; does not establish confidential production to NMDOJ. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-017 | DOJ's public EFTA materials cite redactions or restrictions including victim privacy, Rule 6(e), CVRA, 18 U.S.C. 3509, and protective orders. | DOJ_POSITION | doj-epstein-disclosures doj-efta-review-protocol | Public-release rationale; record-specific application to NMDOJ access unresolved. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-018 | EFTA permits specified public redactions and requires written explanations for withheld or redacted material. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | govinfo-plaw-119-38-efta | Public EFTA framework, not a complete state-law-enforcement access answer. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-019 | DOJ's January 30 public statement says it published more than three million responsive pages under EFTA and identified categories not produced publicly. | DOJ_POSITION | doj-2026-01-30-release | Public release; not proof of NMDOJ confidential access. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-020 | DOJ's January 30 letter describes additional SDNY review and certification obligations before certain court-record release. | DOJ_POSITION | doj-2026-01-30-congress-letter | Court-record/public-release context; not a NM-specific decision. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-021 | Jay Clayton publicly said the New Mexico request involves unredacted documents subject to protections including court protective orders, and that DOJ personnel were seeking an accommodation consistent with those orders. | DOJ_POSITION | sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | Public hearing excerpt; not a complete written response. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-022 | An official Senate page says Todd Blanche committed on record to cooperating with New Mexico's investigation. | DOJ_POSITION | sen-hirono-2026-07-15-blanche | Official Senate summary, not underlying full transcript archived in this run. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-023 | DOJ Touhy regulations govern production or disclosure in proceedings where the United States is not a party, and include criteria for authorization. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | ecfr-touhy-subpart-b govinfo-cfr-28-part16-pdf | Legal procedure; actual NMDOJ request/decision not public. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-024 | Rule 6(e) can restrict disclosure of matters occurring before a grand jury, but the acquired record does not establish that all NMDOJ-requested records fall under Rule 6(e). | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | uscode-rule-6 doj-2025-12-19-congress-letter | Record-by-record application unresolved. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-025 | The Crime Victims' Rights Act protects victim dignity and privacy interests relevant to public disclosure and controlled access decisions. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | uscode-cvra-3771 | Does not alone resolve whether confidential production to a state prosecutor is permitted. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-026 | The Privacy Act may restrict federal records maintained on individuals but includes exceptions and does not become a record-specific bar unless DOJ invokes and applies it. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | uscode-privacy-act-552a | No NM-specific Privacy Act analysis located. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-027 | Child-victim and CSAM authorities support strong public-release restrictions for protected material. | LEGAL_AUTHORITY | uscode-child-victim-3509 doj-efta-review-protocol | Controlled law-enforcement access remains a separate handling question. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-028 | EFTA II is proposed legislation and is not treated as governing law in this tracker. | LEGAL_CLASSIFICATION | nmd-efta-ii-draft nmd-2026-07-15-efta-ii-release | Could change if enacted. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-029 | The acquired sources do not include a DOJ written response to NMDOJ's June 30 letter. | ACQUISITION_FINDING | nmd-2026-06-30-letter sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | Negative finding based on official-source searches and acquired source set as of retrieval. | UNRESOLVED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-030 | The acquired sources do not include a record-by-record DOJ production ledger for the NMDOJ request. | ACQUISITION_FINDING | nmd-2026-06-30-letter | A non-public ledger may exist. | UNRESOLVED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-031 | No court or official authority acquired in this run states that DOJ legally obstructed New Mexico's request. | LEGAL_CLASSIFICATION | nmd-2026-07-09-press-release sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | NMDOJ and Senator Heinrich use obstruction/hindering language as party or political framing; not adopted as an adjudicated finding. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-032 | The DOJ EFTA00009664 and EFTA00009654 records show actual Maxwell-case protective/confidentiality orders, but they do not prove all NM-requested records are covered. | COURT_ORDER_FINDING | doj-efta00009664-maxwell-protective-order doj-efta00009654-rule17-confidentiality-order | Record-specific mapping not public. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-033 | The archive contains New Mexico/Zorro Ranch overlap records in EFTA and transcript datasets, but presence in those records is context only and does not imply wrongdoing by named people. | ARCHIVE_CONTEXT | doj-epstein-disclosures | Archive cross-matches require independent claim testing. | CONFIRMED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-034 | The House Special Investigatory Committee's public June 2026 subpoena PDFs were acquired, but service proofs, returns, responses, and compliance records were not acquired. | ACQUISITION_FINDING | truth-commission-subpoenas truth-subpoena-usao-sdny | The public folder establishes document availability, not service or compliance. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-035 | DOJ public release redaction standards cannot be silently imported as the full legal answer to NMDOJ's confidential law-enforcement access request. | LEGAL_CLASSIFICATION | govinfo-plaw-119-38-efta ecfr-touhy-subpart-b | Requires record-by-record legal analysis and any DOJ written decision. | SUPPORTED |
| NMDOJ-CLAIM-036 | As of the July 19, 2026 acquisition run, the current compliance posture is pending/source-gated, not resolved. | STATUS_FINDING | nmd-2026-06-30-letter sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | Status should be updated if DOJ publishes a response, a court rules, or NMDOJ reports receipt/non-receipt after July 31. | UNRESOLVED |
Potential conflicts and non-conflicts
The tracker uses a strict contradiction standard: two propositions must be unable to coexist before being labeled a confirmed contradiction. None of the acquired records meets that standard.
| ID | Proposition A | Proposition B | Classification | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTRA-001 | NMDOJ says no substantive response had been provided and access had not been granted. nmd-2026-06-30-letter | Jay Clayton said DOJ personnel were seeking dialogue with NMDOJ to reach an accommodation consistent with protective orders. sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | NO_CONTRADICTION | These propositions can coexist: dialogue or attempted accommodation after June 30 would not necessarily mean a substantive written response or production had occurred by June 30. |
| CONTRA-002 | NMDOJ asks for unredacted access to names and records for law-enforcement purposes. nmd-2026-06-30-letter | DOJ public EFTA protocol redacts victim-identifying information for public release. doj-efta-review-protocol | NO_CONTRADICTION | Public redaction and controlled law-enforcement access are different disclosure settings; the statements do not inherently conflict. |
| CONTRA-003 | NMDOJ treats July 31 as the date by which non-receipt will be deemed a denial. nmd-2026-06-30-letter | HR 1 separately makes July 31 the interim report deadline for the House Special Investigatory Committee. nmlegis-hr1-final | NO_CONTRADICTION | The same date has two different functions in two different tracks; there is no contradiction, but there is a high risk of public confusion. |
| CONTRA-004 | Some sources use obstruction or hindering language. nmd-2026-07-09-press-release | No acquired court order or DOJ written response adjudicates obstruction. sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | PARTY_DISPUTE | This is a party/political framing versus adjudicated finding distinction, not a confirmed contradiction. |
Archive overlaps
Crossmatches show where the New Mexico property or related terms appear in existing Grok Archive Hub datasets. They are context rows only unless an underlying record independently supports a specific claim. Zorro Ranch location context EFTA Compliance Tracker
| Archive ID | Source Class | Term | Relevance | Relationship | Context Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFTA00208312 | EFTA location record / archive location context | Epstein New Mexico Ranch / Zorro Ranch | Existing GAH Trump/Epstein location evidence maps Zorro Ranch as an archive location reference. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /investigations/trump-in-the-epstein-files/locations |
| US-v-Maxwell-ECF-863 | court filing text archived under EFTA compliance release | New Mexico ranch | DOJ Maxwell opposition contains New Mexico ranch references and related testimony context. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /evidence-data/efta-compliance/source/text/us-v-maxwell-ecf-863-doj-opposition-2026-06-24.txt |
| Doug-Band-Transcript | House Oversight transcript autopsy source | New Mexico ranch | Context-only overlap with a witness transcript; not proof about NMDOJ's request. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /document-autopsies/doug-band-transcript |
| Leon-Black-Transcript | House Oversight transcript autopsy source | Santa Fe / New Mexico | Context-only overlap; not proof about NMDOJ production status. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /document-autopsies/leon-black-transcript |
| Apollo-Dechert-Report | public corporate disclosure archived for Leon Black autopsy | Santa Fe property | Context-only network/archive overlap; does not imply wrongdoing or prove NM production. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /document-autopsies/leon-black-transcript |
| Phang-ECF-21 | non-party court filing archived under EFTA compliance release | Torrez / New Mexico | Docket-context crossmatch only; not used to characterize DOJ compliance. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /evidence-data/efta-compliance/source/text/phang-v-blanche-ecf-21-motion-to-intervene-2026-07-15.txt |
| trump-epstein-locations-json | machine-readable GAH dataset | Zorro Ranch | Machine-readable location crossmatch; context only. | CONTEXT_ONLY | /evidence-data/trump-epstein/locations.json |
What this does not establish
- It does not establish legal obstruction by DOJ.
- It does not establish that every requested record is barred by a protective order, Rule 6(e), the Privacy Act, or victim-protection law.
- It does not establish that DOJ produced no records at all; it establishes that no public production ledger or written NM-specific response was acquired.
- It does not infer criminal conduct from Zorro Ranch references, archive overlap, travel records, address-book presence, testimony questions, or committee framing.
Open questions and acquisition gaps
| Gap | Missing Primary | Needed To Resolve | Last Attempt | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAP-001 | NMDOJ February 13, 2026 initial request letter | Exact records requested and any initial deadline or legal basis. | Official NMDOJ June 30 letter and July 9 release reviewed; standalone February 13 letter not located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-002 | NMDOJ March 13, 2026 formal letter and five illustrative EFTA IDs | Record-by-record production ledger and redaction basis. | June 30 letter describes but does not attach the March 13 letter. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-003 | NMDOJ May 3, 2026 Touhy letter | Formal demand scope, attached documents, legal basis, and requested production conditions. | June 30 letter describes the Touhy letter; no standalone PDF located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-004 | DOJ written Touhy response or denial to NMDOJ | DOJ's official record-specific legal basis and any production/refusal status. | Official DOJ, USAO-NM, NMDOJ, and Senate-source searches located no written response as of this run. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-005 | Transmission logs or production inventory for any records provided by DOJ to NMDOJ | Whether DOJ produced anything, what, when, and under what restrictions. | No official public production ledger located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-006 | NM-specific protective agreement, MOU, confidentiality agreement, or state-court subpoena | Whether controlled access was offered, accepted, rejected, or judicially compelled. | June 30 NMDOJ offer located; no DOJ acceptance or state subpoena located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-007 | Rule 6(e) petition or protective-order modification motion specific to New Mexico access | Whether DOJ sought or refused a judicial route around court restrictions. | DOJ EFTA public-production court-order trail acquired; no NM-specific petition located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-008 | House Special Investigatory Committee subpoena service proofs, returns, responses, and compliance records | Whether the 20 public June 2026 HR 1 subpoena PDFs were served, answered, complied with, narrowed, or challenged. | Committee pages, handout, public Drive folder, and 20 subpoena PDFs acquired; service and response records not located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-009 | Full official July 15 hearing transcript or video for Blanche/Hirono exchange | Exact question-and-answer wording beyond official Senate summary. | Official Senate release acquired; underlying full transcript/video not archived. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
| GAP-010 | Victim-notification, privacy, or controlled-access protocol tailored to NMDOJ | How privacy interests would be protected if unredacted law-enforcement access is granted. | General EFTA and statutory privacy sources acquired; NM-specific protocol not located. | ACQUISITION_PENDING |
Machine-readable support layer
Sources and hashes
The archived binaries and HTML source captures are public evidence-data assets, served noindex. HTML source captures are served as text to avoid confusing the evidence route with a frontdoor page.
| Source ID | Title | Type | Date | Pages | SHA-256 | Archived Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nmd-2026-02-19-zorro-reopen | Statement from the New Mexico Department of Justice Regarding Zorro Ranch | official state press release | 2026-02-19 | 5627e81d2aa0effe5c0ad90c520c58baa5e9ad338d6d472feecc60873dd63253 | archived | |
| nmd-2026-03-09-zorro-search | Statement from New Mexico Department of Justice Spokesperson Regarding Today's Search of the Former Zorro Ranch | official state press release | 2026-03-09 | 1a7c8bb4e8b50772d2632def7502015a94d69a746d2b7daa53b99c33b6a85ae5 | archived | |
| nmd-zorro-tip-page | Epstein Zorro Ranch Tips | official state tip page | 2026 | 0508c24eae4f79c1f24547d54c24bfb9a6b956ccc4f383a88d087ef7ced1dbfd | archived | |
| nmd-2026-06-09-world-without-exploitation | At World Without Exploitation Annual Conference, New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez Tells Survivors: We Will Be True and Honest Warriors on Your Behalf | official state press release | 2026-06-09 | af9194973d8d6b330d4f5a414a188274c0d17c68639186f6c98bf6c18fcb974e | archived | |
| nmd-2026-07-09-press-release | Attorney General Raul Torrez: USDOJ is Hindering Our Criminal Investigation by Withholding Unredacted Epstein Files | official state press release | 2026-07-09 | 746674398f2db52701fa05cfb8a9e9b24587a5471775c1e2508a5145e57f89e5 | archived | |
| nmd-2026-06-30-letter | NMDOJ correspondence to Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche and Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana | official state letter | 2026-06-30 | 4 | 6ada36bec2781a1e1eac9a2c859f55806c4e63df6d2a7d4843339a9068c0dd62 | archived |
| nmd-2026-07-15-efta-ii-release | Attorney General Raul Torrez, Representative Leger Fernandez Push New Legislation to Force DOJ to Release Remaining Epstein Files | official state press release | 2026-07-15 | 262ddfe9814d639bffdc968b0b4bf36f7ce04f39d2792327c51f2b92ca977080 | archived | |
| nmd-efta-ii-draft | Epstein Files Transparency Act II draft | proposed legislation draft | 2026-07-15 | 10 | 98f0161fb3b601bba8765ab1865a9891f22eb7daf13d2987012845702efcc95f | archived |
| truth-commission-home | New Mexico Epstein Truth Commission | official committee website | 2026 | e275be948563a9742f05b9f129fe28bb49f35a7d849bfbf1e0d6b7aebfd3925d | archived | |
| truth-commission-subpoenas | New Mexico Epstein Truth Commission Subpoenas | official committee website | 2026 | 0a6d9a174ecfe1283bd29a52f3f69e2e59c4ddc8f4f3fa1d30851264453a8e0a | archived | |
| truth-commission-meetings | New Mexico Epstein Truth Commission Meetings and Archives | official committee website | 2026 | fa7bcea1674be0d5bf323bb92f3ef16dde619d2b29ba37d35dd57dc37c4e718c | archived | |
| truth-commission-drive-folder | New Mexico Epstein Truth Commission public documents folder | public document folder landing page | 2026 | 4da43586209bb114a7fae6ebc9f1456a05f99cfe753bbd756b40bb07eb26fd91 | archived | |
| truth-subpoena-deutsche-bank | Deutsche_Bank_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 14b09a92bbeba9cafe9f32975da33d8e5ff39c40f0b9fcbd2a4b549ae6f5b97f | archived |
| truth-subpoena-nm-doh | NM_DOH_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 12 | 2df03ecf290de42d25e7fa769ef65a35ada764f444843ff994e575f0e507a0b5 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-nm-prc | NM_PRC_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 12 | f9a964ff3d4e534ed5684e97f9b0c7b5b0c620a533de19f902f8b73dc6f1f0d8 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-state-records-archives | State_Records_and_Arc_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 11 | 4365be0a3ce04f0d41a31f51de5620603de63e3bfcf24e7c9f86ac1b3fb923b1 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-vi | USAO-VI_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | d0fe91cb9a69e38b1222ba5fca5dc135a74ef645be121eb394b1cdcad9bd3be7 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-wdmi | USAO-WDMI_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 12f0aa6e08ad62eaf41ed01d38126b0854f348b6a81f4d554ec63d5db9c89b9f | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-sdfl | USAO-SDFL_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 33c462e8a86018918f2d8a4de15ba2526440280b62e643c465311dd04971450d | archived |
| truth-subpoena-jp-morgan | JP_Morgan_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | ccc7d15eb8fea49e62fe497e39bba4ec6ea5ad5e952c9c2567a39343c71a2961 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-nm-rld | NM_RLD_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 679abbfb4e9015619ae1eb59af9b25566512e9c2c3c982e469706a2d60c7984b | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-sc | USAO-SC_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 4a8533de4aa40562ca2a432b5572a2ded887b3d9231d22c941be3ae7e11d24e7 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-edmi | USAO-EDMI_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | c54646235e4af9159ffc3f1f13f79b262584dffa8d4780d7b4732f242f63680f | archived |
| truth-subpoena-nm-state-land-office | NM_State_Land_Office_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 9 | 9a2ddd31da001882fca1ecc691d08015e729d54d95cb42776cca69a870c52976 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-office-of-ag | Office of AG_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 6ba418ec49776b45762c2df170851c4f24e1803f21f8f3a4f871485473d5b36c | archived |
| truth-subpoena-sf-institute | SF_Institute_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 10 | 6ecdfeb53b128d65604b9453e4b7ba7bb9bd4513e79098f0dcf72e62c0f587bc | archived |
| truth-subpoena-sf-county-sheriff | SF_County_Sheriffs_Office_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | fdb25f2ef4017386cae7488fe63dce92b4f58ec46485dc93c8a460e1ea448208 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-nmdps | NMDPS_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 3ad47e5bbb11b241cdb045edd76bf5033e3eabd18e5fef144065ab40b13d5922 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-office-of-governor | Office_of_the_Governor_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | f7c6ca01aff3c3444555ca85ed5b0d161fd8cdce477d12a80c3e74d7605acd92 | archived |
| truth-subpoena-faa | FAA_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 9 | ee654d39a5ccb49e8a0309aeaa8b6535e4af273994064cfdaa2e58691d5421cd | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-nm | USAO-NM_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | af966c9458467ef70497f699cc1724f634fe4811327b8626baaad7fa923e39eb | archived |
| truth-subpoena-usao-sdny | USAO-SDNY_2026_HR1.pdf | official public committee subpoena PDF | 2026-06-26 | 8 | 9ebffe893224af41d2bf340c19c2cdd0a5195a73c7b20cef66c99dafafe8caeb | archived |
| nmlegis-hr1-page | New Mexico HR 1 legislation page | official legislative page | 2026 | a809436767497ea7faf9887d2dd75a7a4f7988639d8bbaf115fe442835b88f85 | archived | |
| nmlegis-hr1-final | House Resolution 1 final text | official legislative resolution | 2026 | 5 | 0693111b7054a0c119bc79906e38f2a0bf878c8c52a367b5b45fb18a3c1bc4c6 | archived |
| nmlegis-hr1-fir | House Resolution 1 Fiscal Impact Report | official legislative fiscal impact report | 2026 | 3 | 75505d54367b7cb414955a0ff9ac8c4a21c86abb4a905195aadad59f4ec53c41 | archived |
| nmlegis-hisc-page | House Special Investigatory Committee page | official committee page | 2026 | e6ea7da1921f4f8c74bc7334a8b1820b417d4341b35b04a66a3ad4ea77b33762 | archived | |
| nmlegis-hisc-jun01-agenda | House Special Investigatory Committee June 1, 2026 agenda | official committee agenda | 2026-06-01 | 1 | 1bbb2d5dfa705094f2e7a2e7710208bc614da144c2ef7aad18714efb58ffa5dc | archived |
| nmlegis-hisc-jun18-agenda | House Special Investigatory Committee June 18, 2026 agenda | official committee agenda | 2026-06-18 | 1 | 69af3091b2c4825c5acd1598780134bbf45d6e14b5e9ec537b7c007e804fab42 | archived |
| nmlegis-hisc-jun01-handout | House Special Investigatory Committee June 1, 2026 handout | official committee handout | 2026-06-01 | 10 | 8d4b71115dbce46c047c2bf1ab25b09206c7882e902a05f6a1446d6a4ad97b65 | archived |
| sen-heinrich-2026-07-15-clayton | Heinrich presses Jay Clayton on DOJ obstruction of New Mexico investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's crimes at Zorro Ranch | official congressional press release | 2026-07-15 | b6cce652a2d454304c6ab14900a093a2e223fad7aecb07e4cad69099fe7341c8 | archived | |
| sen-hirono-2026-07-15-blanche | Hirono presses Attorney General nominee Todd Blanche on DOJ weaponization and rule of law | official congressional press release | 2026-07-15 | 770c840a91ee30fc0ac2abe8935dd5cc29f8e6094d4c5361cef210dfcc598ed1 | archived | |
| doj-epstein-library | Epstein Files Transparency Act page | official DOJ webpage | 2026 | a11f316c4df97db9abfa54126ea31386aaf86f6adc07d40d3931f046995a7b7d | archived | |
| doj-epstein-disclosures | DOJ disclosures under the Epstein Files Transparency Act | official DOJ webpage | 2026 | 0e2d908f194830fb4f99a4e230529e9dd40f92df018dbf7cef6bd8b800007ef3 | archived | |
| doj-oip-efta-foia-library | Office of Information Policy FOIA Library - Epstein Files Transparency Act | official DOJ webpage | 2026-07-16 | 84661b29a843304182a830ae4281bbb7ff489096f1d89796ca7a2de9eaca0e8d | archived | |
| doj-efta-review-protocol | Attorney Review Protocol for EFTA Production | official DOJ protocol | 2026-01-04 | 9 | eff4797fa8485116c82948d7d73dea83fd5914451db275a9f05d75d340d3c2e4 | archived |
| doj-2026-01-30-release | Department of Justice publishes 3.5 million responsive pages in compliance with Epstein Files Transparency Act | official DOJ press release | 2026-01-30 | fd8781e5c718c17ff5393ddb213e2b00626bc8e4327d35b336f1a92ed2cf3582 | archived | |
| doj-2025-12-19-congress-letter | DOJ December 19, 2025 EFTA letter to Congress | official DOJ letter | 2025-12-19 | 6 | 5d112b90e6bfee4e35f0a0a5698cf3893a72325fcba4d5e91c5d76e5a3000846 | archived |
| doj-2026-01-30-congress-letter | DOJ January 30, 2026 EFTA letter to Congress | official DOJ letter | 2026-01-30 | 6 | 40e4fd583cd30e927da99ccf822abb1196408243e053034a314fdcbc08b05206 | archived |
| doj-2026-02-14-congress-letter | DOJ February 14, 2026 EFTA letter to Congress | official DOJ letter | 2026-02-14 | 6 | 73c2008faf2893615af8217173e4e1c65f329e43cc1745cff124456041805098 | archived |
| govinfo-plaw-119-38-efta | Public Law 119-38 - Epstein Files Transparency Act | federal statute | 2025 | 4 | 223eea508617cbd4238c1eb94e23c5c61cc627a6ea05dc185660cb137355cd97 | archived |
| ecfr-touhy-subpart-b | 28 CFR Part 16 Subpart B - Production or Disclosure in Federal and State Proceedings | federal regulation | current as retrieved | 604777dd8d69be85cf809295f57eb82f235a659ada6f5f2c9780b35016a3d28a | archived | |
| govinfo-cfr-28-part16-pdf | 28 CFR Part 16 official PDF | federal regulation | most recent as retrieved | 144 | 56670661b256a8b1298c9e1d87cd8920e32795dbd762b156e16cc35c5d089616 | archived |
| uscode-rule-6 | Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 | federal rule | preliminary edition as retrieved | 6e69e285ff3474630fff8a22c7c66721970acd1c88b0fe05ba0391416db8b3fd | archived | |
| uscode-rule-16 | Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 | federal rule | 2023 edition as retrieved | 625e112a2a38f80f7810369dabd9fc82df431514d3a48b906af0339386c942b8 | archived | |
| uscode-cvra-3771 | 18 U.S.C. 3771 - Crime victims' rights | federal statute | preliminary edition as retrieved | c7506a5abedc57349327a39ec4cd8f1711e720db5ac356f9d638b9244e4c0131 | archived | |
| uscode-privacy-act-552a | 5 U.S.C. 552a - Records maintained on individuals | federal statute | preliminary edition as retrieved | 7fd854b1593402c8bb34fbe040c8b5a15cb11d23e9237cd78388df353d00580b | archived | |
| uscode-foia-552 | 5 U.S.C. 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings | federal statute | preliminary edition as retrieved | 5280c5fffb769057a82b8a7d8d7cc8b114cbbbe3458e43badbb8fae9a8deb3b9 | archived | |
| uscode-jencks-3500 | 18 U.S.C. 3500 - Demands for production of statements and reports of witnesses | federal statute | preliminary edition as retrieved | 710ea2bbf84d71767cafe08f270bf51766f4e2f383ec58cb18318549edb18d68 | archived | |
| uscode-child-victim-3509 | 18 U.S.C. 3509 - Child victims' and child witnesses' rights | federal statute | preliminary edition as retrieved | 496ec289c21abb88a704a6f33b5f928359e2499c51d1ad694dcc28f83909ed14 | archived | |
| uscode-2256-definitions | 18 U.S.C. 2256 - Definitions for sexual exploitation and other abuse of children | federal statute | preliminary edition as retrieved | d950dbce812bc6afeec4659cb5c1be3b20b03e0f520d8b9ae48d1a0e66128988 | archived | |
| doj-efta00009664-maxwell-protective-order | United States v. Maxwell EFTA00009664 - Protective Order | court order republished by DOJ | 2020-07-30 | 12 | f218b2d1dc4b4b3429924f12ea37764cf86894f15fcdd99ef9bfcddf1682e8e4 | archived |
| doj-efta00009654-rule17-confidentiality-order | United States v. Maxwell EFTA00009654 - Rule 17 confidentiality order | court order republished by DOJ | 2020 | 4 | c8efcca27e17a0f12c90983ddf1f9349ac532bfefd7b9723eaae9139a6052e42 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-810 | United States v. Maxwell docket 810 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 8 | 609a635b94a7e4fe5edcfdfe04c34234d210439cdc7f2631cc8a51d6afa08f67 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-811 | United States v. Maxwell docket 811 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 2 | dcebfedf2222facde339e188881f7a6096daeedf4bf4a371daab41eabbecc3a4 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-813 | United States v. Maxwell docket 813 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 4 | b76f0e2f302fbf24c76a0d726141c09c364dad74377315033447b436535f2ef2 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-819 | United States v. Maxwell docket 819 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 4 | 167457adbdbea98c712eb670f8a4188cbb0bfcbf3b534fe4b16507957c11711d | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-820 | United States v. Maxwell docket 820 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 24 | 5790d0263d30b33d4e424f2e0562dd32c14543eb369a22c6a61a2068c66a73a2 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-823 | United States v. Maxwell docket 823 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 5 | bf3c43b1f4d0dec4001b6405fbaa2239e61fb128442a5e9d3aa0eba72c11e595 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-826 | United States v. Maxwell docket 826 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 5 | 55913dde06d00a1d7e8c6f6a21ddf9d49e89fe2a64f84448bf4c821c35d8aeb8 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-839 | United States v. Maxwell docket 839 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 4 | 70b1b67772d6bc704e31a1de04cccbe85a0e6a092a0efae0c8fdc0f5fd33ecf9 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-845 | United States v. Maxwell docket 845 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 4 | 3840b28cb82e9def76e8b0666e05b684d135997da79b4f4ba207a0c06965ee49 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-846 | United States v. Maxwell docket 846 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 4 | 12b5bf0763e7701370e78e7d031e2ffafa0ddbbf6b4c70ed108e6e5e8a8ad611 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-847 | United States v. Maxwell docket 847 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 2 | abe3a209ecc61fb4bafa06ee366e7b19908bcee857c431f76af1f0fc0cc1cca8 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-848 | United States v. Maxwell docket 848 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 4 | e74042497489adc1c2cf83960f8cfb64c106bfacc03134bfa945e3f98c60da23 | archived |
| courtlistener-maxwell-849 | United States v. Maxwell docket 849 PDF from RECAP | court filing or order mirror | 2025-2026 | 8 | 5a27b2ab760fd74febde3e33b54c818240662bdad7660a26ee7a37d1a95427d1 | archived |
Sources, methodology, and corrections pathway
This page uses official state, federal, congressional, legislative, court, and archive records. Secondary reports were not used as proof. If DOJ publishes a written New Mexico response, a court enters an order, or the New Mexico House committee posts subpoena PDFs, the relevant row should be updated rather than inferred. Corrections can be sent through Corrections.
Related source-first pages: Leon Black Transcript Autopsy, Doug Band Transcript Autopsy, EFTA Compliance Tracker, Contradiction Ledger, Open Questions, and Timeline Reconstructions.
Support public evidence
Public evidence remains open.
Public evidence remains open. Patreon membership supports continued document acquisition, source verification, hosting, and new investigative releases.